EPM has plagued horse owners for several decades with an
estimated clinical prevalence of less than 5% of horses being affected, causing not only a potential loss of function and performance but also high costs to the owner in terms of diagnostics and treatment. When I was in vet school, the disease was
first being clinically recognized and treated.
In those days, we saw the worst of the cases that were admitted into the
veterinary school and many of these horses were recumbent and unable to stand
or even turn themselves. As students on
the late night watch, we were often given the chore of hooking these horses to
overhead hoists and physically turning them every few hours to minimize bed
sores. It seemed futile in many cases as
often, they were unable to eat due to body positioning, which contributed
to the body wasting and further muscle weakness.
Cause:
The disease
is caused by a parasite called Sarcocystis neurona, which gains entrance the
body and then targets peripheral nerves or the central nervous system,
eliciting an inflammatory reaction which impairs nerve function. The parasite is thought to be transmitted by
the opossum primarily, but barn cats and various birds have also been implicated in the past, with the horse
inevitably being exposed while grazing on pasture or through contaminated feed. The horse is considered an aberrant host and once infected, they are not a risk to spreading the parasite to other horses.
Prevalence:
In my
practice, the exact prevalence of the disease amongst our patients was less
than 5%, but may be higher in other regions of the country. Blood testing of horses has indicated a positive
antibody titer in up to 80% of horses (in my practice area), but the majority of these do not
demonstrate clinical signs. A positive serum Western Blot simply implies exposure to the parasite and does not define clinical infection. It seems as
if the prevalence of the disease, at least in my area, has actually declined
over the past several years or quite possibly, they are just not being
recognized as having a problem by their owners.
Clinical
Signs:
When I was a
student, we saw the worst of the worst when it came to EPM cases. Upon graduation, often we were misled in
thinking that they always presented this way. With more clinical practice years under my belt, I learned that there were many clinical presentations with the majority of
them being mild. In many cases, mild EPM
cases have presented as an unexplained or ‘shifting’ lameness. The lameness may be present in one limb one
day then the next in another area. If I
was presented with a lameness that I could not pinpoint or localize, we would
often screen for EPM. The clinical examination involves not only a full physical exam, but evaluation of neurological function. Peripheral and cranial nerves are evaluated for deficits, which may help us in localizing the disease. Limbs may be flexed and evaluated for lameness, but they will also be evaluated for conscious proprioception (CP) by crossing the limbs at times. In most cases, when limbs are crossed over, they are quickly replaced to normal position by the horse. Those with neurological impairment may have a delayed or no response. Tail and anal tone are also evaluated, in addition to the tail pull to determine if there is muscle weakness present. The parasitic
infection generally targets nerves and with this, we can have many types of
presentation with varying degrees of severity. The condition is progressive in most cases, with time being of the essence in terms of best outcomes for treatment. The most common types of
presentations would involve one of the following
- · Lameness
- · Muscle weakness / atrophy
- · Poor performance/intolerance
- · Ataxia (uncoordination)
- · Stumbling or tripping
- · Recumbency/unable to stand
- · Difficulty eating/swallowing or ‘choke’
- · Head tilt
- · Behavioral changes
Diagnosis:
The
diagnosis of EPM can be tricky, but in most cases we base the diagnosis upon
the combination of clinical signs in addition to other laboratory data. In our patients, if there is a suspicion of
EPM, we would submit a blood antibody titer (Western Blot) to rule in or out the disease. A positive test on blood is NOT confirmative
for a diagnosis of EPM, but a negative result generally rules out the
parasite. If the blood test is positive,
which equates to a history of exposure to the parasite, often the next step is
to perform a spinal tap in the lumbar region, again looking for antibodies or parasite DNA (PCR) in the spinal fluid. In more recent years, technology has allowed for more refined antibody testing of serum in order to obtain specific titers, which may help to differentiate between exposure and actual clinical disease.
Several issues
have risen over the past few years regarding spinal taps. First thing to remember is that there is risk
to the procedure for both the patient and veterinarian. It can be painful at times, resulting in a
horse kicking out to the side which may injure people around the horse. In other cases, horses have been known to
buckle upon insertion of the needle, resulting in potential injuries. Spinal taps may also potentially worsen ataxia or uncoordination in clinical horses and may be difficult to perform successfully in recumbent animals. The biggest problem with spinal taps is blood
contamination of the sample. If a horse
is positive, they will have antibodies present in the bloodstream. In order to perform a spinal tap in the
horse, the needle actually has to pass through several inches of muscle, which
are saturated with blood. The current
thought process is that there is a potential for the needle to be exposed to
the blood, gather antibodies and thus produce a positive spinal fluid
sample. In the end, it is hard to prove
that a positive spinal tap is not due to blood contamination and thus a false
positive.
Due to this
fact, we stopped performing spinal taps several years ago and have more or less
relied on clinical signs along with a positive blood antibody titer. It certainly is not 100% definitive, but is
safer and less expensive in the short run to gather data and assess for a
response to medications.
Differential Diagnosis:
Other considerations for a horse demonstrating neurological clinical signs includes toxicity, herpes viral infection, Easter/Western encephalitis, West Nile, Rabies, equine degenerative myelopathy, equine lower motor neuron disease and cervical vertebral stenosis (wobbler syndrome). Either clinical signs or further testing can help to rule in or out these diagnoses.
Treatment:
For many
years, we have used a combination of antibiotics; sulfatrimethoprim with
rifampin, to help manage the parasite infection. The combination was often fairly successful,
but required many months of
therapy. Over the past decade, we have
seen some improvement in therapies, which include a medications such as diclazuril, toltrazuril, ponazuril and NTZ, which have all shown promise and require less time for treatment.
Results from
therapy can be variable with noted improvement in less than 75% of cases and a full recovery in less than 25%. In some cases, the patients would
actually get worse during therapy for a brief period due to the parasite being
killed off and eliciting an inflammatory type reaction. In many cases, the patients would recover
but continue to have neurological issues or deficits resulting in loss of use,
decreased performance and even euthanasia in some cases.
One of the
biggest problems when treating an EPM horse are relapses, which can be quite
high. In many situations, horses would
appear to recover, only to demonstrate clinical signs again within the next
6-12 months. This is not only
frustrating but expensive for the owner as it often entailed another course of
medication.
Other therapies often used adjunctively include non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, corticosteroids, DMSO and antioxidants, with vitamin E being most commonly used.
Thoughts /
Prevention:
Many years
back, an astute veterinarian raised the question as to how the parasite was
gaining access to the systemic circulation.
After all, most bacteria and parasites are killed off by high acid
levels in the stomach or by other factors in the gut. In order for the parasite to gain access, there
would have to be a breakdown in the gut barrier in some shape or form. Upon further exploration of this theory, it
was proposed that many of these clinical horses had gastric ulcers, which may
be allowing the parasite to gain access to the body. There are many theories out there, many of
them still unproven, but this ulcer theory opens the door to many questions.
If we blood
test 10 horses for antibody titers, approximately 8 of them will be positive
and maybe 1-2 of those 8 will actually be clinically sick. Why?
What makes those 1-2 horses different or more susceptible to clinical
disease? When we look at the ‘ulcer
theory’, this raises the question regarding the impact of stress on the body,
which may be hindering the immune response.
The body creates many barriers to prevent invasion by bacteria, viruses
and other parasites, but the immune system is ultimately responsible for detecting and eliminating
invaders into the body. So, what
potentially causes a deficiency in the immune response? This can be a genetic cause, dietary related,
stress induced….the list goes on. It has been noted that stress and immune compromise increase the susceptibility to a horse contracting EPM. Likewise, the incidence of EPM also appears to be higher in competitive horses, which may be undergoing increased levels of stress.
What I have
found and explore with these patients is the status of the immune
response. In all of our cases, I have
submitted what is termed a CBC (complete blood count), which is fairly routine. What I am looking for is the level or status
of the white blood cells, specifically the lymphocyte. I have noticed that many EPM cases have
lowered lymphocyte levels upon presentation. Those horses with lowered lymphocyte counts also appear to be more likely to experience relapses. It is potentially a crude means of evaluating
the immune response and predicting relapse rates, but none the less is valuable in my opinion.
When we were
first treating these patients years ago, I would almost always add in some type
of immune supplement along with traditional therapies. Originally, I would use a cattle dewormer
called Levamisole, which has demonstrated immune enhancing properties. It would help in most cases, but there was
always a need for something better. Several
years later, I discovered and researched medicinal mushrooms and their impact
on immune health. There are several
types of mushrooms that demonstrate immune enhancing capabilities and have been
researched for decades with verifiable results.
We soon developed and began to utilize what became our EQ Immune &Repair formula in our EPM cases and noted a tremendous impact along with
traditional therapies. The patients did
better overall and recovered more completely.
Aside from
the immune component, we have to remember that there is also a strong
inflammatory reaction that is occurring and contributing to neurological
deficits. In many severe cases,
especially in recumbent horses, clinicians would utilize a steroid or DMSO to help
combat the inflammation. The steroid
would help in a high percentage of cases, but potentially came at a cost due to
a high incidence of side effects, including gastric ulcers, further immune
suppression and even laminitis. We used
these steroids in some of our cases, but needed something more complete,
gentler and more effective for systemic inflammation. We began to utilize our EQ Plus
formula in our EPM cases to combat inflammation as well as provide antioxidants in addition to our Immune
& Repair formulas, alongside of the traditional therapies. Again, we noted a more complete and quicker
recovery in a high percentage of cases.
In some cases, due to the expense of pharmaceutical medications, many
owners were unable to afford traditional therapies and we were forced to manage
them using our EQ Plus and Immune & Repair formulas. It was stunning to see that a high percentage
of these horses recovered and obtained remission without the need for
anti-parasitic medications. The results
were achieved based on improving overall immune health and managing
inflammation.
Our results
have been confirmed by many of our Cur-OST® customers, stating an enhanced
recovery as a standalone therapy or even in cases that have relapsed and were
no longer responsive to traditional therapies.
Prevention
of EPM from my point of view is rather simple. We can make attempts to 'clean up' the environment and make it less attractive to the Opossum, but it is next to impossible to eliminate the parasite completely from the environment. We can, however, enhance overall health in these
patients by improving immune function and controlling ongoing
inflammation. Factors such as stress,
lifestyle, diet, genetics and many others directly contribute to inflammation,
which then potentially impacts immune health.
It becomes obvious in many EPM cases that inflammation was a preliminary
problem as many of these horse have other concurrent issues such as lameness,
poor performance, laminitis, COPD and even insulin resistance. We need to look at the patient as a whole to
get a better understanding on how poor health influences the prevalence of
these diseases.
In the end, EPM is a complex condition with a multitude of opinions on how to treat and manage. We need to stop looking to pharmaceutical medications as being the end all be all answer and start looking at the patient as a whole, including their environment and lifestyle.
All my best,
Tom Schell, D.V.M.
www.curost.com
www.curost.com